divinity

If you were to divide the tiniest particle you could find into yet smaller portions of itself, would you find the seed within matter that creates life? Would you know what the answer was to the question, “What am I?” No. And yes. It all depends on how you look at it. To find merely dust of elemental nature would be to miss the point altogether. To find energy would be closer to the point, and how that energy is interacted with determines its nature within reality. To find divinity is, indeed, the point, and beyond that point remains to be discovered. The power of the energy of an atom divided is enough to rip your world apart or, at best, disturb the flow of life to a grinding halt. The force unleashed by dividing certain smaller particles is greater yet on the order of magnitude, yet divinity is only approached until at last, in the quest for obliteration of the simplest forms of matter, energy of polarity is finally in the target of the great matter-smashing machine. To rip apart the force that binds positive and negative, life and death, fear and trust is to divide divinity’s own force of love from that in which love takes form. Thus free, divinity roams, and all of creation feels the power divine love has within the world of form, which is, in a word, awesome. Nothing else comes close to the transformative power of divine essence unlocked from form. Form itself cannot maintain structural integrity and, if not obliterated, form becomes energetically defined by virtue of raw divinity engaging with its body. That which is not of a form’s essential truth is burned away and what is left becomes the form of divinity itself.

6 Responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Spyros on October 17, 2008 at 3:29 pm

    You are messing up philosophical terms (matter) with physical quantities (mass, energy, force).
    This leads nowhere. If you want to find God, look at philosophy not physics.

    Reply

  2. Posted by opalescentwords on October 17, 2008 at 3:47 pm

    Spyros, while I appreciate the distinction you are drawing, what is written is no more “messing up” aspects of reality than the ancient sages and yogis. Do you then deny that there is a source common to both philosophy and physics? It cannot be proven that there is not. That is a point at which an understanding of God can be approached.

    Reply

  3. Posted by Spyros on October 18, 2008 at 6:28 am

    First of all, philosophy is not about understanding God. For instance, for materialism, no Gods or spirits exist.

    Then in general we can say that the common source would be the need of mankind to search for the truth.

    Reply

  4. Posted by opalescentwords on October 18, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    You said: If you want to find God, look at philosophy.

    I am looking beyond the need of man to the common source, Truth.

    Reply

  5. Posted by Spyrps on October 19, 2008 at 4:53 pm

    “I am looking beyond the need of man to the common source, Truth.”

    I didn’t understand this sentence.

    Philosophy and science are indispensable in the quest for the truth.

    Reply

  6. Posted by opalescentwords on October 21, 2008 at 4:39 am

    How about, “I am looking beyond man’s need to find the truth, to the Truth.”

    Yet perhaps Truth, and God, can only be known (by us) as approximations… as the center of a bit of matter can be sliced in half again and again and again. What is at the exact center of matter? What is at the exact center of truth? Perhaps only that it is.

    I think, the Pleiadians would say, to find God, look at each other. ;-)

    Thank you for your comments and careful reading!

    Reply

Respond to this post